Saucony Guide 8 vs Asics GT 2000

Confused between Saucony Guide 8 and Asics GT 2000? Both are high-quality running shoes that are geared for enhanced stability, suitable for people with moderate overpronation. However, these two running shoes share quite a lot of similarities. They both have mesh uppers with stitched-on and no-sew overlays to enhance the support and structural integrity. For sure, both shoes are very comfortable. Continue reading below to see the detailed comparisons between Saucony Guide 8 vs Asics GT 2000 running shoes!

Upper Construction
Both Saucony Guide 8 and Asics GT 2000 come with sturdy and durable stitched-on overlays on the uppers. There are several overlays on the medial side, which is exactly where overpronators tend to require additional support. Furthermore, both shoes have light no-sew overlays around the toe box. The difference is that Asics GT 2000’s stitched-on overlays are pulled backward a little bit further so that the forefoot is more open. Hence, Asics GT 2000 will be a little bit more comfortable in the toe box area.

Saucony Guide 8 features solid overlays wrapping the heel area to provide support and stability – see the comparisons of Saucony Guide 8 vs Ride 8 here. On the other hand, Asics GT 2000 features an external heel counter, which is just as effective if not better.

Midsole Cushioning
Both Saucony Guide 8 vs Asics GT 2000 offer full heel-to-toe cushioning for the best comfort. However, the cushioning of Saucony Guide 8 is way cushier, especially in the heel area, thanks to the crash pad placed there. So, this model is a great choice if you often experience heel pain or if you simply prefer a softer, cushier ride.

Asics GT 2000 has two GEL foam layers in the midsole to provide cushioning. Of course, the GEL cushioning is actually very responsive and comfortable, but placing two layers of it seem to make the overall feel firmer and more supportive. This model is great if you prefer to get more support from the cushioning.

Nevertheless, both Saucony Guide 8 and Asics GT 2000 are meant to support the runners. Each of them is equipped with a medial post to achieve such purpose. While the medial posts have similar lengths, Saucony Guide 8’s medial post goes higher than Asics GT 2000’s medial post. As a result, Saucony Guide 8 can provide stronger pronation control. But Asics GT 2000’s soft foam layer will enable more gradual pronation control as the foot rolls in.

Outsole Design
Both Saucony Guide 8 and Asics GT 2000 have decent separation and segmentation, which means that they have very good shock absorption and dissipation. Both also provide pretty good ground contact. Both shoes have rubber outsoles. Saucony Guide 8 has many more sipes and biting edges, so it can provide more grip and traction. However, the difference is not very noticeable.

- Fabric/Synthetic
- Imported
- Rubber sole
- Shaft measures approximately 2.82" from arch
- Lightweight runner with patterned mesh and no-sew overlays
- Synthetic
- Imported
- Rubber sole
- Shaft measures approximately Low-Top" from arch
- Rearfoot and forefoot GEL cushioning system

Conclusion
If you prefer a cushier ride, Saucony Guide 8 should be the way to go. It has a softer, cushier midsole, and the quality is especially more apparent in the heel area. It is great if you often experience heel or joint pain. However, if you prefer firmer and more supportive shoes, Asics GT 2000 is the way to go.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *