GEL-Nimbus 18 vs Glycerin 13

Both Asics GEL-Nimbus 18 and Brooks Glycerin 13 are top shoe models with neutral cushioning. These two models are suitable for neutral runners, people who don’t pronate or supinate too much. Many people love these shoes because they are very comfortable for running. So, how do these neutral cushioning shoes compare to each other? Below, we will discuss the comparisons betwe Asics GEL-Nimbus 18 and Brooks Glycerin 13 in order to see which one is the best. So, before you make your choice, make sure that you understand Asics GEL-Nimbus 18 and Brooks Glycerin 13’s differences by continue reading below!

There is a similarity between their uppers: They both have no-sew overlays the entire foot very well. However, there are still notable differences. First, Brooks Glycerin 13 has a broad overlay that wraps the midfoot, giving lots of support there. Asics GEL-Nimbus 18 does not have such thing, so the upper can be slightly more flexible and looser. Second, Brooks Glycerin 13 does not have an external heel counter like the one on Asics GEL-Nimbus 18, which gives some support around the heel area. Third, Asics GEL-Nimbus 18’s toe box is slightly more open and freer than that of Brooks Glycerin 13, due to the fewer overlays. So Asics GEL-Nimbus 18 can give more support on the heel area, but is somewhat looser and freer on the midfoot and toe box, whereas Brooks Glycerin 13 provides lots of support to the midfoot area.

Both models here have been designed to give superior cushioning to runners. Asics GEL-Nimbus 18 offers a sophisticated cushioning system with the GEL cushioning sandwiched in-between two foam layers. The top foam layer is softer, functioning to give comfort to the foot, whereas the bottom foam layer is more responsive and solid for stability. The midsole also acts as a crash pad that attenuates road impacts. On the other hand, Brooks Glycerin 13 has a standard foam midsole that is 25% thicker than that of regular Brooks shoes, with the entire midsole also functioning as the crash pad. However, Brooks Glycerin 13 has somewhat less cushioning on the forefoot area. Since these shoes are designed for neutral runners, neither has any additional stability feature. But Brooks Glycerin 13 is the more stable one out of the two, due to the better segmentation and ground contact.

The rubber outsoles of Asics GEL-Nimbus 18 and Brooks Glycerin 13 are very different to each other. Brooks Glycerin 13 comes with three different zones to create pressure distribution and smooth transitions from heel-strike to toe-off. On the other hand, Asics GEL-Nimbus 18 has a more traditional outsole with large rubber slabs for durability and a vertical flex groove for gait efficiency.

- Shaft measures approximately Low-Top" from arch
- Rearfoot and Forefoot GEL Cushioning Systems
- FluidRide provides the ultimate combination of bounce back and cushioning properties with reduced weight and exceptional durability
- Adjustable saddle construction allows for a snug fit
- Soft blown rubber forefoot supplies lightweight cushioning and grip
- 3D Fit Print overlays provide structural support at a reduced weight

For a smoother and more stable ride with some support, Brooks Glycerin 13 is the way to go. If you prefer a soft and cushy ride, then go for Asics GEL-Nimbus 18.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *